FAQs & Resources

Download a printer friendly PDF of our updated FAQs

What Are Genetic Modified Foods (GMOs)?

According to the World Health Organization, “genetically modified (GM) foods are derived from organisms whose genetic material (DNA) has been modified in a way that does not occur naturally”. Genetic engineering uses the process of artificially inserting foreign genes into the cellular structure of a plant, animal or microorganism in a laboratory to gain desired traits, i.e. herbicide tolerance, the ability to produce insecticidal toxins or other alleged benefits. They are commonly known as GMOs, genetically modified or genetically engineered organisms.

Currently approved genetically engineered crops are usually created one of two ways. The first is through a "gene gun". Scientists essentially shoot millions of genes into a plate of cells, which are then cloned into a plant. The other way is through a bacterial infection; scientists use various bacterial strains that help transfer the new gene into another plant's cell.

Genetic modification DOES NOT occur in nature. It is the manual process of choosing a genome from one species and inserting it into the DNA of another species.  This process is only possible in a laboratory.

Example: Certain genetically modified corn has been engineered to produce pesticides in its own cellular tissue. This GMO corn is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency as an Insecticide, but is sold unlabeled in grocery stores in the United States.


What is the difference between a Hybrid and a GMO?

Genetically modified (GM) foods are derived from organisms whose genetic material (DNA) has been modified in a way that does not occur naturally.

Hybrids are created by the crossing of two compatible plants to create a new plant with characteristics of both parent plants.


What Foods Have Been Genetically Engineered?

Today, an estimated 75% of the processed food in the U.S. contains genetically engineered ingredients. Since their introduction in the food supply in 1996, the 5 main commodity crops (corn, soybeans, cotton, sugar beets and canola) have been genetically engineered to kill insects in farmers’ fields and/or survive the application of the weed killer Roundup.

According to the USDA, 93% of corn, 94% of soybeans and 95% of cotton contain patented genetically engineered genes as well as 95% of sugar beets and canola according to industry reports. In addition, varieties of genetically engineered papayas, zucchini, yellow crookneck squash, alfalfa and sweet corn have been approved in the United States.

At the moment, GMO apples, bananas and GMO salmon (the first genetically engineered animal), are awaiting approval or under review in the U.S., in addition to new varieties of GMO corn, soybeans and cotton that have been genetically engineered to survive the application of toxic herbicides.


Who Supports Labeling Genetically Engineered Foods?

More than 171,000 Coloradans signed petitions to get this on the ballot. This is a non-partisan issue. Already 64 other countries, including all European Union member states, Japan, Australia and other key U.S. trading partners have laws mandating the disclosure of genetically engineered food on food labels. This includes 16 of the top 25 countries that import food from Colorado companies.

More than 100 scientific and public health institutions around the world support GMO labeling to track potential allergic responses due to genetically engineered foods, including the American Public Health Association, American College of Physicians, American Nurses Association, the British Medical Association and the American College for Advancement in Medicine.

To date, GMO labeling laws in the U.S. have passed by wide legislative majorities in Connecticut, Maine and Vermont.

To see a sample of just some of the COLORADO FARMERS AND RANCHERS WHO SUPPORT PROP 105 click HERE.

Who Opposes Labeling Genetically Engineered Foods?

In the past two years, the world’s largest chemical and biotech seed companies and America’s giant food manufacturers have spent nearly $70 million to defeat GMO labeling initiatives in California and Washington State. In the past 6 months, DuPont, Dow Chemical, Monsanto and food manufacturers Pepsi, Coca-Cola and General Mills have spent more than $27 million to block GMO labeling at the federal level, which is roughly 3 times their spending in all of 2013.

These same chemical and biotech companies and giant food manufacturers have spent over $16.5 million dollars in Colorado in the last two months in their attempts to defeat Proposition 105.


Aren’t GMOs needed to feed the world?

Proposition 105 has no impact on world hunger.  It is not a ban on GMOs. It is just a label. It merely seeks to inform consumers about the foods they are purchasing and consuming.


Are Genetically Engineered Foods Safe?

GMOs have not been proven safe, and no long-term human health studies have been conducted. Unlike the strict safety evaluations required for the approval of new drugs, the US Food and Drug Administration does not require safety studies for genetically engineered foods. The United Nations/World Health Organization food standards group and the American Medical Association have called for mandatory safety testing of genetically engineered foods -- a standard the U.S. currently fails to meet.


I’ve heard that GMO seeds are basically the same as non-GMO seeds. Is that true?

The US Patent Office issues Biotech companies patents on genetically modified seeds to protect the unique attributes because they are significantly altered from nature. This contradicts claims that GMO and non-GMO seeds are fundamentally the same.


Aren’t there current laws on labeling GMOs?

Currently there are no Colorado or Federal laws requiring the labeling of GMOs. The FDA allows for volunteer labeling, but there are NO requirements.


Why Proposition 105?  Why do my family and I need it?

Under Proposition 105, labeling genetically engineered foods would provide basic information to let Coloradans make more informed buying decisions, offering more choice and control over the transparency of their food purchasing decisions.

Without proper labeling and transparency it is difficult for doctors and pediatricians to determine where food allergies and sensitivities arise.

Because families and individuals are dealing with an increasing level of food allergies and sensitivities, we demand more information about the genetic makeup and source of our food.


Does this result in a ban on GMOs?

NO. This initiative only requires the addition of “Produced with Genetic Engineering” on the label or container of GM foods. It is not a ban. And it does not require segregation of crops.


Will Proposition 105 cost taxpayers a lot to enforce?

Proposition 105 will not require any additional revenue to cover implementation, which is simple and easy to comply with. It will be enforced under current Colorado regulatory structures. The state of Colorado has determined that a maximum of two staff are needed for compliance; total cost is estimated at $113K-$130K/yr paid from the state General Fund, or 2 cents per Coloradan per year.


Won’t it make grocery costs go up?

Any estimation is a speculation and there could be no rise in costs at all.  However, in a recent study Consumers Union, the public policy and advocacy arm of Consumer Reports, concluded that the average cost of labeling would be $2.30 per person per year. [The opposition cites a study by Cornell University professors regarding the potential cost impact in NY state; and it estimates a maximum rise of $1.42 per person per month for the cost of labeling.] 


Will it be costly for farmers to comply with the requirements of Proposition 105, separating GMO from non-GMO crops?

We are not calling for a ban on GMOs, simply a label on foods known to be genetically engineered.  Proposition 105 does not require farmers to change anything with regard to the farming techniques and systems that they currently use.  However, a shift is already in progress.  The demand for non-GMO ingredients is on a sharp rise and farmers who choose to grow non-GMO products are receiving a premium for them.


Why are there exemptions?  Why isn’t everything covered in Proposition 105?

This is a reasonable and balanced first step. Colorado state law allows one subject to be addressed per ballot initiative.  For instance, alcohol and foods served at a restaurant are regulated under different statutes and would be considered a different subject. What is covered is actually upwards of 75% of foods sold in the grocery store.  Everything from the produce section on one side, through all of aisles of packaged goods, and through to packaged bakery goods.


Is it true there is 0% tolerance threshold for GMO ingredients found in trace amounts in non-GMO foods?

NO. Proposition 105 does not dictate a 0% tolerance.  This is not in the language. This is a statutory amendment, not a constitutional amendment, so this allows flexibility and fine tuning through public hearings.  The Colorado Dept of Public Health and Environment will make the decision on tolerance level.   Any Colorado citizen can weigh in on this during said public hearings.


How Can I Help?

We can work together to win our right to know about the genetic engineering of our food. Please join our cause for updates on our efforts. Like our Facebook Page to learn about volunteer opportunities and ways to contribute to the movement.


If you want to know more about GMO labeling, what it is, and how it affects you, check out some of the links below:





And a HUGE thank you to the folks at Podio for giving us an amazing online tool to organize our team!  

Donate Volunteer


get updates