It's Official - We're Moving Forward to Collect Signatures!

Colorado GMO Labeling Initiative Overcomes Challenge by Biotech, Junk Food Lobby; Supreme Court OKs Statewide GMO Labeling Ballot Title

Despite a challenge by conventional grocery interests, the Colorado Supreme Court on March 13 affirmed Right to Know Colorado’s ballot title to label GMO foods, clearing the way to begin collecting the 86,105 signatures needed for a 2014 statewide ballot measure.

DENVER (March 18, 2014) – In overturning a major challenge by mainstream biotech, pesticide and grocery interests to a statewide GMO labeling ballot initiative, the Colorado State Supreme Court on March 13, 2014, affirmed the title for Ballot Initiative #48 to label the presence of genetically modified foods, commonly called GMOs, on food packaging. In doing so the Colorado Supreme Court turned away a challenge to the title of Right to Know Colorado’s GMO ballot initiative.

The Supreme Court ruling allows the Right to Know Colorado campaign, a grassroots effort established by local residents to achieve mandatory labeling of GMOs in foods, to begin circulating petitions for signatures to place the initiative on the November 2014 ballot. Colorado requires 86,105 valid signatures to be submitted by early August to place an initiative on the ballot, according to Rick Ridder of Denver-based RBI Strategies and Research, political advisor to the Right to Know Colorado campaign. The campaign plans to partner with local farmers, farmers markets, moms, faith-based organizations, natural, organic and non-GMO food retailers, and other health, sustainability and consumer advocacy organizations to gather the signatures needed.

“We are pleased that the state Supreme Court ruled in favor of the GMO labeling ballot title, and we look forward to bringing a GMO labeling initiative before the voters of Colorado this fall. Coloradans have the right to know what is in their food, and to make purchasing decisions for their families based on knowing whether their foods are genetically engineered, and we believe they will have that opportunity after November,” said Larry Cooper, one of the proponents of the Right to Know Colorado initiative.

To view the ballot title as approved by the Colorado Supreme Court, visit https://www.sos.state.co.us/pubs/elections/Initiatives/titleBoard/results/2013-2014/48Results.html.

With no federal GMO labeling requirements in place in the U.S., it is estimated that more than 80% of conventional processed foods contain genetically engineered ingredients, primarily from GMO corn, soy, canola, cotton, sugar beets and other GMO crops. However, according to national GMO labeling advocacy organization Just Label It, more than 90% of U.S. consumers surveyed want mandatory labeling of GMO foods. While pro-biotech interests claim that GMOs are safe, a growing body of scientific research suggests there may be enough risks to justify the need for consumer transparency. More than 64 other countries require mandatory labeling of genetically engineered or GMO foods. Colorado joins more than two dozen other states, including Oregon, Arizona, Vermont, New Hampshire, New York, Pennsylvania and elsewhere, in calling for GMO labeling legislation.

About Right to Know Colorado
Right to Know Colorado GMO is a grassroots campaign to achieve mandatory labeling of genetically engineered foods or GMOs across the state. Right to Know Colorado is built on the foundation that we have the basic right to know what is in our food and what we are feeding our families. The campaign gives Coloradans the opportunity to make informed decisions about their diet, health, and general lifestyle. Food labels list and describe nearly every detailed component of the food product, from the caloric values and processing information, to the fat and protein content and the known allergens. Adding a simple label for GMO ingredients would fulfill Colorado consumers’ right to know, enabling them to make educated food purchases and dietary choices for themselves and their families. For more information visit www.righttoknowcolorado.org, https://www.facebook.com/RightToKnowColorado. To contribute, visit https://righttoknowco.nationbuilder.com/donate, or contact Steven Hoffman, Compass Natural Marketing, steve@compassnatural.com, tel 303.807.1042.


Showing 43 reactions

Please check your e-mail for a link to activate your account.
  • commented 2014-07-06 23:21:48 -0600
    The campaign plans to partner with local farmers, farmers markets, moms, faith-based organizations, natural, organic and non-GMO food retailers, and other health, sustainability and consumer advocacy organizations to gather the signatures needed.
    Thanks
    http://www.contacttelephonenumbers.com/sony-customer-service-contact-number/
  • commented 2014-06-20 16:09:01 -0600
    We certainly wish Colorado had the option to sign petitions online. The state requires signatures in person. Because we are working with volunteers to collect signatures, it is best to sign up for emails and follow us on Facebook to see where people are collecting signatures. We are making every attempt to have coverage in Whole Foods during lunch and dinner and at several Vitamin Cottage locations on the weekends. Contributions will also help us hire paid circulators. Every $10 helps us get 20 signatures. Please consider donating, volunteering if you can, “Liking” our Facebook page and signing up for our eblasts.
  • commented 2014-06-20 05:54:57 -0600
    This is a terrible website. The first think it should have on the website is where to go to add your signature. Who the heck designed this website?
  • commented 2014-06-06 04:19:41 -0600
    And I agree with Alan. Need links to regional coordinators.
  • commented 2014-06-06 04:18:28 -0600
    I don’t like the exemptions either. This is a “small step”. But it’s a good step. We have to stop the “all or nothing” attitude and move forward with SOMETHING. Concerned about what the meat you eat has been fed?? Me, too. That’s why I buy organic, grass fed meat from the source. And I KNOW the source. Food for livestock is another battle. Let’s win THIS one first. Stand together folks.
  • commented 2014-06-05 09:23:23 -0600
    Hi Alan, thanks for your suggestions. If you are interested in helping to collect signatures, please attend a training. We offer them in person and online and have a few this week and next. Once trained, you’ll receive information about the volunteer captain in your area. We welcome comments here and on our Facebook page and you can email us or call us, volunteer@righttoknowcolorado.org, 720.467.0189.
  • commented 2014-06-05 09:08:55 -0600
    This site is missing one of the most important aspects in regards to petitions and the ultimate goal. There needs to be a link where we can contact volunteer captains in areas that have taken the responsibility of collecting personal signatures for the State ballot.
    Also it would be a great idea for a forum link for us to stay in touch with one another to help push this through with ideas and game plans.
  • commented 2014-06-04 10:10:47 -0600
    Thank you, Tammi DeVille, for the phone number.
  • commented 2014-06-02 12:03:00 -0600
    If you have a question regarding the initiative that you would like to discuss in depth, please call the Campaign office at 720-467-0189 or send an email to volunteer@righttoknowcolorado.org. Thanks!
  • commented 2014-06-02 08:51:06 -0600
    I agree with the last two commenters. Are the folks leading this campaign at Right to Know Colorado reading these comments? If so, would someone from the campaign please respond?? This initiative failed in Washington State for these very reasons: (1) The wording was misleading and confusing, and (2) the exemptions watered down the bill. Why exempt livestock that has been fed or injected with genetically modified food or drugs??? Why exempt food for animals? The end result should be as transparent as possible. No fuzzy loopholes that can easily be taken advantage of! I’m telling you this: I have very liberal-minded friends and family in Washington State who voted against I-522 because of the above stated reasons.
  • commented 2014-05-25 18:22:16 -0600
    I agree with Nicka Moo. The terms are very misleading and does not favor the anti-GMO agenda!
  • commented 2014-05-23 08:03:34 -0600
    Can someone please help me understand; why there needs to be so many exemptions in the new rule? Can anyone explain why it says “exemptions including, but not limited to..” I am worried that so much effort could be put forth and result in legislation that acts hardly as a dent in the multinational GMO agenda.
    “products produced, not packaged, and intended for immediate consumption” What does this refer to?
    Will potato chips, cheez-its, processed cereals and mayonaise have GMO labels on them if this movement succeeds? Who wrote this referendum, and can anyone help me get in contact with someone who can answer these questions? I would like to continue helping this movement as a circulator however I need these questions answered first.
  • commented 2014-05-12 16:15:35 -0600
    So you want folks to sign but give no info on how or where to sign. You have sabotaged your effort .
  • commented 2014-04-07 23:24:01 -0600
    The fact that this is even an argument is disgusting. Show me where to sign and how to get people to sign. i’m sick of rich fucks getting richer poisoning the people.
  • commented 2014-03-27 12:23:56 -0600
    Seems like we might be paving the way for GMP if we are not careful.
  • @KimDoyleWille tweeted link to this page. 2014-03-26 21:42:17 -0600
  • posted about this on Facebook 2014-03-26 05:22:06 -0600
    It's Official - We're Moving Forward to Collect Signatures!
  • commented 2014-03-25 20:34:26 -0600
    Where do I sign????
  • posted about this on Facebook 2014-03-25 18:42:34 -0600
    It's Official - We're Moving Forward to Collect Signatures!
  • commented 2014-03-25 18:19:54 -0600
    Hurray!
  • commented 2014-03-25 17:22:26 -0600
    Can’t wait to make this happen and set this example!!!!!
  • commented 2014-03-25 15:26:20 -0600
    Wow…the rest of the nation needs to take an example. Colorado is showing the most forward thinking in this country at the moment.
  • commented 2014-03-25 13:07:33 -0600
    Very proud to be from Colorado! Cant wait to sign :)
  • commented 2014-03-25 12:48:08 -0600
    Thank you, COLORADO RIGHT TO KNOW!

    Your friends at COLORADO MOVE TO AMEND
  • commented 2014-03-24 10:50:11 -0600
    Hi Dolly,
    We hope to have petitions printed in early April. Please make sure you’re signed up to receive our emails and if you’re on Facebook, please like our page. We’ll share where you can sign as soon as we know! Thanks for your support!
  • posted about this on Facebook 2014-03-24 10:40:45 -0600
    It's Official - We're Moving Forward to Collect Signatures!
  • commented 2014-03-24 07:01:49 -0600
    Where to we sign the petition?
  • posted about this on Facebook 2014-03-23 16:24:00 -0600
    It's Official - We're Moving Forward to Collect Signatures!
  • posted about this on Facebook 2014-03-22 13:58:30 -0600
    It's Official - We're Moving Forward to Collect Signatures!
  • @Erzulie777 tweeted link to this page. 2014-03-22 08:37:16 -0600